This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
start [2022/01/19 22:18] 111.225.149.99 old revision restored (2019/10/09 13:32) |
start [2022/01/20 18:36] 154.54.249.205 old revision restored (2021/08/11 05:20) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
**OpenRxM** is initiative to discuss and write about " | **OpenRxM** is initiative to discuss and write about " | ||
- | [[Thesis_1|Thesis 1]]: " | + | __Thesis 1__: " |
- | [[thesis_2|Thesis 2]]: Artificial Intelligence (AI) does well join in e.g. when it comes to reverse-engineering of failure-modes and may well propose condition- or prediction-based proposals of actions to be executed within maintenance task on a much more dynamic level, than current maintenance approaches may provide in operation. | + | __Thesis 2__: Artificial Intelligence (AI) does well join in e.g. when it comes to reverse-engineering of failure-modes and may well propose condition- or prediction-based proposals of actions to be executed within maintenance task on a much more dynamic level, than current maintenance approaches may provide in operation. |
- | [[thesis_3|Thesis 3]]: Maintenance is managed on failure-mode level; RxM will provide smarter portions or bandwith of action to be executed within a specific, failure-mode related maintenance task. | + | __Thesis 3__: Maintenance is managed on failure-mode level; RxM will provide smarter portions or bandwith of action to be executed within a specific, failure-mode related maintenance task. |
- | Starting point will be EN 13306 to identify, what already has been defined | + | Starting point will be EN 13306 to identify, what already has been defined in a widespread standard. |
- | [[Urs_Gehrig|U. Gehrig]] (October 8th, 2019) | + | [[start|U. Gehrig]] (October 8th, 2019) |